Topic: Capitalism

What is the difference between Capitalism and Communism really?

In America, there are the destitute hobos, the financially unsecure, the middle class, the well to do guys, rich bastards, and rich politics. In Communism, there are usually are poor citizens and rich politics. In doesn’t matter what type of government is better it seems because someone is always going to be filfthy rich while the majority just make ends meet. There is no true equality in Communism and this sure isn’t the case in Capitalism so why fight over which is better?

Communism makes you a slave to the majority.
Capitalism makes you a slave to a minority (the capitalists; ones who own the means of production).

How do we shrink Capitalism down to where we can drag it into a bathroom and drown it in a bathtub?

I don`t want to abolish Capitalism, I simply want to reduce it to the size where I can drag it into the bathroom and drown it in the bathtub.

For the record, capitalism is a synonym for freedom, when discussing economics. So, if that’s where you stand, that’s good to know. It informs my opinion of anything else you might ever say.

Is religion the biggest threat to medical capitalism in the world?

If it was not for crazy religious freaks capitalism would work more efficiently because then the free market would work better without a god delusion. If it Were not for religion we might have had cloning people, stem cell research, genetic engeneering, and much more medical research and progress going on by now. If it were not for religious Jesus freaks supposed ‘fically conservative’ freaks in the government.

No, secular humanism is.

The dodgy ethics of secularism may give the impression of progress, but in the long term are a recipe for disaster.

We have seen the results of the great atheist experiment of the 20th century, it was an unmitigated failure in every country that was forced to embrace it. As soon as they got the chance the ordinary people threw the ruling atheist elite out. Some Western nations obviously have not learnt the lesson of history and seem to be intent on increasing secularist influence and ideology, no wonder these nations are now in obvious decline.

The flowering of Western civilisation was due to Christianity. We owe everything to our Christian heritage. The dynamism and optimism and ethical framework that Christianity brought us led to great architecture, literature, art, music, science and medicine. The names of the great Christian innovators, scientists etc. are two numerous to list here, suffice to say that, in the medical field, we have such Christian people as Louis Pasteur and Florence Nightingale who transformed medical treatment through their work.

The constant griping and niggling of of high profile, atheist critics is nauseating and hypocritical in the extreme. They are like spoilt brats who have benefited from Western Christian culture and prosperity and now want to bite the hand that fed them. Atheism has contributed nothing positive to Western civilisation or any other civilisation. It is a destructive force, with a no-hope philosophy which was amply demonstrated in the murderous, repressive atheist regimes of Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Kim il Sung etc.

http://www.amazon.com/Answering-New-Atheism-Dismantling-Dawkins/dp/1931018480

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Dawkins-Delusion-Atheist-Fundamentalism-Denial/dp/0281059276#reader_0281059276

Is the difference between Socialism and Capitalism that Capitalism wouldn’t bail out Socialism if it failed?

In 2008 Capitalism failed. Years of cowboy ideals in finance and deregulation finally caught up, trillions of dollars were lost. Almost (if not every) country based at least somewhat on Capitalism either had to bailout banks, or stimulate the economy if not both.

Capitalism is paranoid, criminal, false economics, (based on having a policy of lying about everything), that fails regularly.

Why does our government play a protectionist roll when capitalism failed to provide enough jobs?

Why not just allow more despair to expose the real problem. Just like military drafts, they end wars quicker because the people put pressure on the politicians. So stop spending government and let it rip. Quick trying to save people from the bad parts of capitalism.

We haven’t had true Capitalism since Progressive hack Woodrow Wilson destroyed it!
Your boy, Carter ended the draft. He also ended collective bargaining for Federal Unions!!!!

What would happen to capitalism if everyone knew the secret to advancement?

Wouldn’t it mean the end of hard work? The end of competition? The end of capitalism?

everyone would be poor

What led to the rise and favoring of capitalism during the industrial revoulution?

why did people favor it, and what were the benefits of capitalism?
be specific(:
thanks soooo muchh!

The fact that it maximizes growth and prosperity probably had something to do with it. That, and the fact that most people prefer freedom of choice.

What is the best alternative to capitalism?

I think that everybody should get a chance to compete in the economy, but I also think that people should reap rewards proportionate to what effort they put into their endeavors. Of course, this is an ideal scenario and nothing could be done to secure it, but what system best accomplishes this?

I’ve heard that the main downside of capitalism is that it cheats hardworking people out of a future because of corporate greed or hyperbole like that. Or it may not be hyperbole. What are your thoughts?

no system is perfect, but with capitalism, you can ‘vote with your dollars’
you choose who to work for.
you choose who to buy goods and services from.

with the government in charge, you have no choice. ever been to the DMV?

What is a differences between capitalism, socialism, and communism?

What is a difference between capitalism, socialism, and communism? What are the pros and cons between those three? What happens if you mix capitalism and socialism together? Explain in best details please and i will give u a best answer if you give a magnificent constructive answers for it. Explain to me what kind of good benefits from each.

Communism first. As described by Karl Marx in "The Communist Manifesto", the idea is to have a revolution that overthrows rich capitalists who exploit the workers and replace it with a society where everyone owns everything in common and everyone shares everything. In the ideal communist society, even money is abolished as it isn’t needed. Read Acts 2 in the bible – the early Christian community did exactly that.

BUT it never works. It can do in a small community like a kibbutz where everyone "buys into the idea", but try it in a whole country and it doesn’t. Human nature means we like to be rewarded for our work, and if you are going to get paid whether you work or not, why do you feel you should work? That’s why communist countries always end up with a shortage of food. The Soviet Union only lasted as long as it did because there was so much bribery and corruption that it was capitalist "behind the scenes". The other thing is that communism leaves it so wide open for power-mad people to become a dictatorship, and that’s what always happens in practice. So you end up with a country with shortages of everything, the people find out it’s better in another country, so they want to leave – and to stop them, the government forbids them to leave the country and tries to stop them listening to foreign radio and TV. To be honest, Karl Marx would have been totally horrified if he had lived to see what the Soviet Union, China and North Korea were like. My favourite quote on this is from Frank Zappa – "communism doesn’t work because people like to own stuff". I really couldn’t say it any better. Nor can I think of any benefits – all this gave rise to the Berlin Wall, and the most emotional experience of my life was visiting the Checkpoint Charlie museum in Berlin and the memorial in Berlin to Peter Fechter. He was an East German boy aged 18 who tried to escape across the wall and was shot to death for it. The memorial says "… er wollte nur die Freiheit", which means, "…he only wanted freedom". If you have the chance to go to Germany one day, do. I love the place and can only have total respect for a people who have lived through two World Wars, been defeated in both, then communism in the eastern part, and somehow still manage to be the strongest country in Europe.

Capitalism is the complete opposite – we all work for ourselves and to make money. Do well, and you get promoted. Do really well and you could have a successful company of your own. OK it means some are a lot richer than others but that’s just life.

Socialism is somewhere in the middle. The real definition of socialism is "social ownership of major industries for the good of the people". Some people confuse this with a "welfare state" but that is misleading, though it is true that the two often go together. I’m British and I remember when we were socialist – basically capitalist, but oil, gas, electricity, telephones, the national airline, the steel industry, the shipbuilding industry, the railways, and many more were owned by the government. Socialists argue amongst themselves as to how far socialism should go so it’s hard to define.

What happens if you mix capitalism and socialism together is you get Britain! We are capitalist but have a nagging feeling that we want to do our best for the people who are poorest as it just seems the civilised way. It’s a hard balancing act – too much social security encourages people to be lazy, but it seems only right to support people who really can’t work.

How are capitalism and the notion of democracy and representative government interdependent?

if either one is failing, how does it affect the other negatively?

Lets take the USA as an example, you could take a view that our traditional version and approach to capitalism is failing, and that is why our traditional approach to our version of democracy is failing, but you could also say it in reverse, that becaue our version of demcracy has failed, that this is why our version of capitalism is also failing. Is this correct?

Democracy is based on individuals having autonomy to make their own decisions as is capitalism. When some individuals are given resources form other individuals, "example" Large corporations or unions sustained with bailouts or other benefits like special legislation" the whole system breaks down because the natural checks and balances are no longer effective.